Tag: family

  • Rediscovering Childlike Curiosity as Adults

    Rediscovering Childlike Curiosity as Adults

    What About You? Where Are You From?

    A few months ago, on my last flight, I sat in the departure lounge watching the world go by. Amidst the monotonous hum of the airport, a vibrant scene caught my eye: a youth football team, clad in matching jerseys, carrying their bags with infectious enthusiasm. They were led by two young men, and the air was filled with the rhythmic calls of “Coach!” from the boys.

    Our paths didn’t diverge at the gate. On the plane, I found my seat right next to a twelve-year-old boy and his teammate. They were part of a group ranging from eleven to fourteen years old. From the moment we took off, they shattered the usual silence of the cabin. They didn’t wait for a social cue or a polite opening; they simply started.

    With immense pride, they told me about their football academy and how they were returning from a spirited regional competition. Throughout the flight, the conversation flowed effortlessly. One of them reached into his pocket, pulled out a bag of chips and some chocolate, and shared them with genuine generosity. When the screen in front of me malfunctioned, he leaned over and fixed it without hesitation, before turning his pure curiosity toward my world:

    “What about you? Where are you from?”

    As the wheels touched the tarmac and it was time to say goodbye, they reached out to shake my hand warmly, saying, “This was the best trip because of you.”

    Those moments still echo in my mind. What is it that gives children this audacity and innocence to open up to someone so different from them — in age, gender, and even skin color? Where does this social simplicity vanish as the years go by?

    I confess, with a hint of caution in my heart, that I have often chosen silence. I have stepped back, avoiding situations where I should have been present. I admit to taking side paths just to avoid a meeting — whether with an old friend or a passing stranger. Now, I find myself wondering about the scale of the opportunities lost.

    Was it a double loss? I lost the possibility of a radical change or an idea that could have opened a new horizon. Meanwhile, the other person lost my humanity, my perspective, and perhaps the comfort I failed to offer.

    How do we rebuild the muscle of innocent curiosity and unlearn the caution we’ve accumulated over the years? How do we return to that version of ourselves that saw the world as a playground rather than a minefield?

    Children don’t carry the “ledger of accounts” we adults fill to the brim — pages dense with anticipated rejections, fear of misunderstanding, and calculations of gain and loss before every simple “hello.” They move driven by curiosity and love. We move driven by the need for protection.

    But I think we can find our way back. Not in one grand gesture, but in small, deliberate ones.

    • By observing people on public transport or in cafes — without labeling or judging them.
    • By allowing ourselves to be genuinely amazed by the stories of ordinary people.
    • By offering a candid admission of ignorance, without the reflex to pretend we know.
    • By searching for those common human intersections where the differences — so magnified by our ledger — simply melt away.
    • By being kind without an agenda.

    Is it possible? I believe so. And I think the twelve-year-old boy on that flight already knew the answer.

  • When War Meets Humanity: A Baby Left Behind

    👶 A Newborn at the Door: Humanity Amid the War in Khartoum

    When the war broke out in Khartoum, someone told this story:

    “My friends and I decided to stay home and not leave. One day, as the shelling grew heavier, we heard loud banging on the door.
    We were surviving. Barely.
    And then — the knock.
    When we opened it, two soldiers were standing there. They handed me a bundle and quickly walked away.

    We unwrapped it — and to our shock, inside was a newborn baby.
    We don’t know where they found him, and we don’t know why they chose our house.”

    What does it mean — to save a life when hundreds are dying? 💔

    I kept reflecting on that moment. Two soldiers, in the midst of relentless bombardment and daily death, left a newborn at the door of strangers.

    This single act revealed something profound: the resilience of human empathy, even in the harshest conditions that strip people of their humanity.

    It was the raw instinct to protect the vulnerable. 🕊️

    We are biologically wired to respond to infant cues. They have signals that activate caregiving circuits in the brain. Even in war, this system does not switch off. In fact, it may grow stronger.

    Seeing a newborn likely triggered an automatic, primal urge in those soldiers to protect life amid surrounding death.

    War often forces soldiers into moral disengagement — psychological mechanisms that justify violence and detach them from empathy. But facing a helpless infant can spark moral re-engagement.

    A baby carries no political, ethnic, or military identity. A baby embodies pure vulnerability. For a moment, it forces recognition of shared humanity — a crack in the logic of dehumanization that war demands.

    And in the chaos of death and destruction, humans search for meaning. Even the smallest act of preservation can be a psychological anchor. Saving that child may have been the soldiers’ way of saying:

    “Not everything is lost. Not everything is meaningless.”

    It was an act of defiance against the absurdity of war — a way to reclaim both agency and humanity.

    The young man who told the story added:

    “We were just a group of young people. We had no idea how to care for a baby. Fortunately, our grandmother was with us — the only elder who had stayed behind. She knew exactly what to do: feeding, cleaning, caring.

    But the dilemma remained: how could we keep him here, with the shelling, shortages, and constant danger? We posted about it on social media. A family preparing to leave the area with their children came and took him with them.”

    Later he wondered: Why our home? Why us?

    Maybe they saw our lights on. Maybe they remembered this street from before. Maybe it was pure chance — the only house with a door still hanging straight.

    Maybe the choice was not random after all. The soldiers may have sensed something — a house that felt safe, civilian, human. Perhaps a fleeting memory, perhaps intuition.

    They didn’t have time to find a hospital. Didn’t have time to find family. Didn’t have time to be heroes. So they did the next best thing — they trusted strangers. 🤲

    While “fight or flight” is the well-known survival response, under collective threat humans also activate “tend and befriend” — the drive to protect the vulnerable and seek social bonds as a survival strategy. Leaving the baby with civilians was an act of social trust: the implicit belief that “someone will care for this child.”

    A newborn represents the future — continuity, renewal, hope. 🌱 Amid scenes of death, preserving a baby is an unconscious affirmation of life itself. Psychologically, it is a defense against existential despair.

    “If this child lives, maybe we haven’t lost everything.”

    Sara

    If you’re reading this — you’re part of that rebellion too. ✨
    Pass it on. Protect someone. Choose life.
    Even when it’s hard. Especially when it’s hard. ❤️